肖茜：两份文件凸显中美AI发展理念差异

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the contrasting AI strategies of China and the United States, with China focusing on open-source models and global cooperation, while the U.S. emphasizes competition and technological dominance [1][2][3] - China's AI governance action plan outlines 13 specific measures aimed at establishing a systematic design for global AI governance, promoting inclusivity and development for the Global South [1][2] - The U.S. AI action plan identifies China as its primary strategic competitor and includes measures to limit China's technological advancements, such as forming international alliances and restricting technology exports [2][4] Group 2 - The divergence in AI model development between open-source and closed-source approaches reflects deeper ideological differences, with the U.S. favoring closed models to maintain control and China advocating for open-source to enhance transparency and community innovation [3][4] - China's approach to AI emphasizes building a self-reliant and open cooperative industrial system, focusing on the social application of AI technologies and promoting a development-centered governance model [3][4] - The U.S. has implemented a "friend-shoring" strategy to create a technology and supply chain network that excludes China, which includes initiatives like the "Chip 4 Alliance" and export restrictions on advanced technologies [4]