Qi Lu Wan Bao Wang·2025-08-08 05:43Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the negative public perception faced by users of Li Auto, highlighting how individual traffic violations have led to a broader stigmatization of the entire owner community, raising questions about the boundaries of social supervision and malicious defamation in the age of social media [1][4][9]. Group 1: Owner Experiences - Li Auto owners are experiencing increased scrutiny and harassment in real life due to negative online narratives, with some facing direct accusations from neighbors and other drivers based on generalized negative sentiments [1][2]. - Owners report feeling pressured to drive more cautiously, fearing that minor mistakes could lead to public shaming online, which has affected their social media usage and personal interactions [2][3]. Group 2: Online Discourse - Discussions surrounding Li Auto owners have escalated on various platforms, with many videos documenting traffic violations by individual owners, but these instances are often generalized to label the entire group negatively [4][6]. - The spread of content that uses absolute statements, such as "99% of Li Auto owners behave this way," contributes to the systemic labeling of the owner community, which is seen as unfair by many compliant drivers [4][10]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts emphasize the distinction between legitimate social supervision and malicious defamation, noting that objective documentation of violations without malicious intent is generally permissible [10][11]. - Actions that involve subjective malice, such as selectively targeting Li Auto owners for negative portrayal, can constitute defamation and violate the reputation of the automotive brand [10][11]. - The article also highlights the responsibilities of online platforms to manage and mitigate harmful content directed at specific groups, as failure to do so could result in legal repercussions [10][11].