Workflow
借鉴国际经验,六方面构建我国离岸人民币市场
Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao·2025-08-08 11:32

Core Viewpoint - The development of the offshore RMB market can draw lessons from Japan's successful experience in offshore finance, emphasizing a low-profile and pragmatic approach to enhance financial competitiveness and support the internationalization of the RMB [1][4]. Group 1: Japan's Offshore Financial Success - The internationalization of the yen was driven by the establishment of a robust offshore financial market, which transformed the yen from a trade settlement tool to a freely convertible currency [1]. - The revision of Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act in 1998 eliminated residual foreign exchange controls, significantly enhancing the linkage between offshore and onshore markets [1]. - The offshore yen lending rate (Euroyen LIBOR) and Tokyo interbank offered rate (TIBOR) spread narrowed to within 5 basis points, creating a mechanism for "offshore pricing - onshore transmission" [1]. Group 2: Functions of Offshore Financial Markets - Offshore financial markets serve as a key platform for the three core functions of currency internationalization: payment, investment, and reserve [2]. - Japan's economic layout in South America, particularly in Brazil and Argentina, exemplifies the deep synergy between offshore finance and industrial investment [2]. Group 3: Mechanisms in South America - In Brazil, Japan's investment reached $78 billion in 2023, utilizing a profit repatriation mechanism that aligns local regulations with offshore financial markets [2]. - In Argentina, despite capital controls, Japanese companies established efficient funding channels through "offshore node interconnection" [2]. Group 4: Low-Profile Strategy and Benefits - Japan's low-profile approach in offshore finance has led to macro-financial stability, enhanced micro-enterprise competitiveness, and geopolitical adaptability [3]. - The offshore market acted as a buffer against external shocks, stabilizing foreign exchange reserves and mitigating speculative pressures [3]. - The low-profile development provided Japanese companies in South America with operational advantages, including lower financing costs and improved tax efficiency [3]. Group 5: Lessons for China's Offshore RMB Market - China's offshore RMB market should transition from "policy-driven" to "institution-driven" and "market-driven," focusing on quality competition rather than scale [5]. - The establishment of a "offshore RMB entity label" system can ensure that offshore funds are closely tied to real trade and investment [5]. - A cross-border "trade-logistics-fund flow" big data verification platform can be developed to prevent false trade and arbitrage [5]. Group 6: Asset Pooling and Risk Isolation - Creating a "RMB-foreign exchange dual fund pool" in pilot areas can enhance the efficiency of fund utilization [6]. - The establishment of a multi-tiered RMB safe asset system through regular issuance of offshore central bank bills and government bonds can attract global investors [6]. - Implementing an "electronic fence" for risk isolation can prevent external shocks from affecting onshore markets [6]. Group 7: Tax Neutrality and Legal Framework - A tax system that is neutral and transparent, similar to Japan's, can reduce policy arbitrage in offshore RMB business [7]. - Establishing an "offshore RMB international arbitration center" can ensure that arbitration rules align with international practices while maintaining control over adjudication [7]. Group 8: Gradual and Low-Profile Approach - A gradual and low-profile strategy should be adopted to allow for institutional adjustments without rushing to create an "international benchmark" [8]. - The focus should be on improving foundational systems such as offshore account functions and tax policies in pilot free trade zones [9].