科创板深化改革配套业务规则落地

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer is a key component in building a multi-tiered capital market to support technological innovation, focusing on high-quality, unprofitable tech companies while balancing development and safety [1][2][3] Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) released the "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Sci-Tech Innovation Board Listed Companies No. 5 - Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer" along with several related business guidelines [1][2] - The introduction of the pre-review mechanism and the professional institutional investor system aims to optimize resource allocation efficiency and enhance risk control [1][2][9] Group 2: Market Impact - The reforms are expected to address the challenges faced by tech companies in the listing process, enhancing the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's inclusivity and adaptability [2][3] - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer is anticipated to support early-stage innovative companies, providing them with financing channels and enhancing China's competitive advantage in global industrial development [3] Group 3: Entry and Exit Criteria - A total of 32 existing unprofitable companies will enter the Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer, with no additional listing thresholds for unprofitable companies [4] - The exit criteria for existing companies remain unchanged, while new unprofitable companies will have stricter exit conditions [4] Group 4: Information Disclosure and Investor Management - The guidelines emphasize risk-oriented information disclosure, requiring companies to disclose risks related to unprofitability and technology development [5] - There are no new trading thresholds for individual investors, maintaining the existing requirement of "500,000 yuan in assets + 2 years of experience" [5][6] Group 5: Pre-Review Mechanism - The pre-review mechanism allows tech companies to have their IPO application documents reviewed before formal submission, aiming to protect sensitive business information [7][8] - The pre-review process will not be publicly disclosed until the formal IPO application is accepted, ensuring market oversight [8] Group 6: Professional Institutional Investor System - The introduction of the professional institutional investor system aims to enhance the identification of high-quality tech companies, with specific criteria for eligible investors [9][10] - This system is viewed as a significant step towards improving the efficiency of capital market resource allocation [9][10]