美国关税行政令7日生效，多国紧急商讨应对

Core Points - The new tariff measures signed by President Trump have come into effect, imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 50% on numerous trade partners, leading to widespread discontent and calls for collective responses from affected nations [1] - The average tariff on imported goods is projected to exceed 18%, marking the highest level since 1934 [1] - Brazil and India are among the countries facing the highest tariffs, with both nations expressing strong resistance to the measures [1] - Switzerland has been particularly affected, facing a 39% tariff, the highest among European countries, which has raised significant concerns for its export-driven economy [3] - Japan, despite having reached an agreement with the U.S., found that the promised tax reductions were not implemented, leading to demands for immediate corrective actions [4] Summary by Category Tariff Implementation - The U.S. Customs and Border Protection began collecting higher tariffs on imports starting at 12:01 AM Eastern Time on July 7 [1] - The tariffs are set between 10% and 50%, significantly impacting trade relationships [1] Affected Countries - Brazil and India are subjected to a 50% tariff, with both countries indicating they will not easily concede to U.S. demands [1] - Switzerland is facing a 39% tariff, which is significantly higher than previously threatened, causing alarm among its export sectors [3] - Japan is facing a 15% tariff, with ongoing negotiations to address discrepancies in previously agreed terms [4] Economic Impact - The tariffs are expected to create substantial pressure on Switzerland's economy, particularly affecting industries such as watchmaking, industrial machinery, chocolate, and cheese [3] - Indian officials have indicated that the tariffs could impact defense procurement plans, although the government later denied any changes to ongoing negotiations [1][3] - The U.S. government's announcement regarding tariffs on transshipped goods is anticipated to target Southeast Asian countries, with potential implications for trade practices [4]