国际观察丨欧美“餐巾纸协议”被批“奖励坏行为”

Core Viewpoint - The recent EU-US trade agreement has been criticized for its vague content and potential to exacerbate future trade tensions, with experts likening it to a "napkin agreement" due to its lack of clarity and enforceability [1][2][3] Group 1: Agreement Criticism - The EU-US trade agreement is seen as poorly constructed, with experts highlighting its ambiguous nature and the likelihood of disputes over its execution [1] - The agreement has been described as more of a statement or informal understanding rather than a solid contract, raising concerns about its durability [1][2] - Previous experiences with US trade agreements have led to skepticism regarding the US's commitment to uphold its side of the deal, as evidenced by past renegotiations that excluded agricultural products [1] Group 2: Economic Implications - The trade agreement is viewed as a reward for bad behavior, undermining decades of global trade principles and potentially increasing protectionism [2] - The shift in US trade policy, with tariffs on the EU rising from 2.2% to 15%, is perceived by some European politicians as a victory, despite the risk of further escalation to 30% [2] - The agreement may lead to greater EU dependence on the US in trade and defense, which could damage the EU's standing as an independent negotiating entity [3] Group 3: Future Outlook - The EU is expected to pursue initiatives to enhance its own capabilities, such as developing its defense industry and expanding trade relations with other economies [3] - There is a possibility that the EU will strengthen its trade ties with other regions, including finalizing a long-negotiated free trade agreement with the Southern Common Market [3]