提振产品业绩表现 基金合同增设港股投资并非万能

Group 1 - The performance differentiation of public funds is linked to the differences in fund contracts, particularly regarding the inclusion of Hong Kong stock investments [1][3][4] - As of August 10, 2025, the top 20 A-share funds have annual returns exceeding 70%, with over 90% of these funds established after 2018, allowing up to 50% allocation to Hong Kong stocks [2][3] - Funds that do not permit Hong Kong stock investments have significantly underperformed, with over 90% of the bottom 10 A-share funds lacking such provisions in their contracts [2][5] Group 2 - The contribution of Hong Kong stocks to fund performance is also evident in QDII funds, which have shown positive returns, contrasting with the stark performance divide in A-share funds [3][4] - Star fund managers managing both new and old funds exhibit a clear performance gap, with new funds outperforming due to broader investment mandates [4][6] - Modifying fund contracts to include Hong Kong stock investments is seen as a potential solution to performance discrepancies, but there are concerns about whether this approach suits all fund managers [6][7] Group 3 - Some fund managers express reluctance to modify contracts for Hong Kong investments, citing unfamiliarity with the market and potential risks [7] - The variability of Hong Kong market conditions raises questions about the sustainability of high returns achieved by A-share funds with Hong Kong stock allocations [7]