伊朗强烈反对高加索走廊计划：“这条走廊将会是特朗普雇佣兵的葬身之地”

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the geopolitical implications of the peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia, particularly concerning the proposed transport corridor that would connect Azerbaijan and its exclave Nakhchivan through Armenia, with significant involvement from the United States [2][5][6] - Iran's opposition to the corridor is highlighted, with Iranian officials stating that they will prevent the corridor's construction, viewing it as a threat to regional stability and a potential means for foreign interference [1][4] - Russia's response indicates a cautious support for the peace talks but emphasizes that any resolution should respect the interests of regional countries and not be influenced by external powers [5][6] Group 2 - The proposed corridor, referred to as the "Trump International Peace Prosperity Road," is expected to grant the U.S. exclusive development rights and a 99-year operational lease, raising concerns about its implications for regional sovereignty and security [2][4] - Turkey's support for the corridor is noted, with the Turkish government expressing hope that it will enhance energy and resource exports from the South Caucasus region, while also indicating a willingness to restore relations with Armenia post-agreement [5][6] - The historical context of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, particularly regarding the Nagorno-Karabakh region, is essential to understanding the current dynamics, as the two nations have been in a state of hostility since the 1990s despite a ceasefire in 1994 [6]