真夸张！买辆新能源车竟没电池，买断电池再付10万？北京法院判了

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled in favor of the buyer, recognizing a significant misunderstanding in the contract regarding the battery status of a second-hand electric vehicle, leading to the cancellation of the sale contract and the requirement for refunds from both the seller and the platform [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - Mr. Yao purchased a second-hand electric vehicle for 178,200 yuan but discovered it did not come with a battery, requiring additional rental fees of 1,560 yuan per month [1]. - The seller claimed to have informed the platform about the battery's rental status, but this information was not clearly presented on the transaction webpage [2]. - The court emphasized that the battery is a core component of electric vehicles, and the platform failed to fulfill its duty to ensure that critical information was accurately displayed [2]. Group 2: Court Ruling - The court determined that the contract should be annulled due to the buyer's significant misunderstanding regarding the vehicle's battery status, which is crucial for the vehicle's performance and safety [2]. - The seller was not found to be in breach of contract as she had communicated the battery's rental status to the platform [2]. - The ruling mandated the seller to refund the purchase price to Mr. Yao, while the platform was ordered to return the service fees and compensate for transportation costs [2]. Group 3: Consumer Advice - Consumers are advised to thoroughly understand vehicle information, particularly regarding battery ownership and condition, before making a purchase [3]. - Platforms acting as intermediaries should ensure they fulfill their obligation to verify and accurately present critical transaction information [3].