整治形式主义关键是科学考核｜经观社论

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for continuous efforts to reduce formalism and lighten the burden on grassroots officials, highlighting the release of the "Several Regulations on Reducing Burdens for Grassroots" as a significant step in this ongoing battle against formalism [1][5]. Summary by Relevant Sections Manifestations of Formalism - Recent years have seen formalism manifest in excessive meetings, mandatory attendance, frequent inspections, and burdensome reporting requirements, which have significantly increased the workload of grassroots civil servants [1][4]. - The introduction of digital tools has added new layers of complexity, with mandatory use of government apps for reporting and tracking, further exacerbating the burden on officials [1]. Specific Measures in the Regulations - The "Several Regulations" propose targeted measures to address the issue of excessive documentation and meetings, such as limiting the length of official documents to 5,000 words and task-specific documents to 4,000 words [1][2]. - The regulations also prohibit using meeting attendance, documentation, and online engagement metrics as performance evaluation criteria [1][2]. Challenges in Implementation - Despite central government efforts to curb formalism, the tendency persists, with an increase in the number of evaluation criteria for grassroots officials, leading to a shift from positive to negative incentives in performance assessments [3][4]. - The proliferation of evaluation items has resulted in a culture where officials focus on avoiding mistakes rather than achieving results, leading to a cycle of meetings and documentation that fails to address real issues [3][4]. Recommendations for Improvement - To effectively reduce burdens on grassroots officials, it is essential to scientifically set evaluation projects and goals, replacing fragmented assessments with comprehensive evaluations that prioritize outcomes [5]. - The article argues that empowering grassroots officials and fostering an environment conducive to innovation is crucial for the success of broader reforms [5].