曹中铭：对问题公司的主动退市须从严监管

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is that the proactive delisting of companies like *ST Tianmao raises concerns about regulatory oversight and the need for stricter measures for problem companies in the market [1][3] - The number of companies voluntarily delisting has increased, with 30 companies announced to be delisted this year, including 5 that chose to delist voluntarily [1][2] - The proactive delisting trend is expected to continue, with 2025 projected to be a significant year for voluntary delistings, contrasting with previous years where the numbers were much lower [2][3] Group 2 - The current delisting rate in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets is notably low, with less than 1% of listed companies delisting annually, indicating a need for improvement compared to mature markets [2][3] - There are concerns regarding the effectiveness of the current delisting regulations, particularly in cases of financial fraud, where many companies are not forced to delist despite engaging in fraudulent activities [2][3] - The case of *ST Tianmao highlights the complexities surrounding voluntary delisting, including ongoing investigations by regulatory bodies and the need to protect investor rights even after delisting [3]