惊天大案！华为芯片技术遭系统性剽窃，罚金高达1350万

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling against Zunpai Communications for stealing Huawei's trade secrets serves as a significant warning to China's tech industry about the consequences of intellectual property theft and the importance of innovation integrity [2][20]. Group 1: Case Overview - On July 28, 2025, the Shanghai Third Intermediate People's Court sentenced 14 former Huawei HiSilicon employees for stealing core chip technology, with the main perpetrator Zhang Kun receiving a 6-year prison sentence and a fine of 3 million yuan, totaling 13.5 million yuan in fines for the entire case, marking the heaviest penalty in China's chip industry for trade secret infringement [2][13]. - The case highlights the systemic issue of technology theft in the Chinese semiconductor sector, emphasizing the need for stringent legal and industry measures to protect intellectual property [2][20]. Group 2: Zhang Kun's Background - Zhang Kun, a semiconductor expert with U.S. citizenship, previously worked at Qualcomm and Huawei HiSilicon, where he played a key role in developing core products like Wi-Fi chips, accumulating significant technical secrets [4][6]. - After leaving Huawei in 2019, Zhang co-founded Zunpai Communications in 2021, which claimed to develop domestic Wi-Fi 6/7 chips but was actually built on a network of stolen technology [6][8]. Group 3: Technology Theft Mechanism - Zunpai's rapid development was facilitated by recruiting over 20 core Huawei HiSilicon engineers with high salaries and stock incentives, who were instructed to covertly steal technical documents and data [6][8]. - Investigations revealed that Zunpai's chips had over 90% similarity to Huawei's trade secrets, indicating a high level of replication rather than innovation [8][10]. Group 4: Legal and Industry Response - Huawei's swift legal action included freezing 95 million yuan in assets from Zunpai and launching a police investigation that led to the arrest of 14 individuals involved in the theft [11][13]. - The court's ruling serves as a clear message that the costs of technology theft can destroy careers and companies, reinforcing the importance of respecting intellectual property rights [13][20]. Group 5: Broader Implications for the Industry - The case reflects a larger trend of technology theft in the semiconductor industry, as evidenced by a similar incident involving TSMC and a Japanese company [14][16]. - The incident raises concerns about the ethical responsibilities of investors and the potential consequences of prioritizing rapid growth over legitimate technological development [16][20]. - The case serves as a reminder that true technological advancement requires sustained effort and integrity, rather than shortcuts through theft [20][21].