Workflow
5岁女童调汽车座椅致后排2岁弟弟窒息身亡,家长诉车企索赔,法院驳回
Qi Lu Wan Bao·2025-08-14 08:36

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal responsibilities regarding product quality and parental supervision in incidents involving children in vehicles, particularly focusing on the design and safety features of car seats [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - The incident occurred on May 1, 2023, when a couple's son lost consciousness in a vehicle, leading to his death due to asphyxia [1]. - The parents claim that the car seat design lacked an automatic return feature and did not provide adequate warnings, contributing to the child's death [1]. Group 2: Defendant's Argument - The defendant, the car manufacturer, argued that the vehicle met national safety standards and that the user manual provided sufficient warnings regarding child safety seat usage [2]. - The vehicle was certified and had been inspected before being sold, indicating compliance with safety regulations [2]. Group 3: Court's Decision - The court ultimately dismissed the parents' lawsuit, indicating that the claims regarding product defects were not substantiated [3].