Cai Jing Wang·2025-08-14 12:50Core Viewpoint - The acquisition of Regen Biotech, Inc. by Aimeike has led to a fierce commercial dispute with Jiangsu Wuzhong, the exclusive distributor of AestheFill in mainland China, following Regen's unilateral termination of the distribution agreement [1][2]. Group 1: Company Developments - Jiangsu Wuzhong announced that it has initiated arbitration against Regen after the latter revoked the exclusive distribution rights of AestheFill, with the arbitration case accepted on August 7, 2025 [1]. - Aimeike stated that it has not yet received any arbitration documents from the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court and will respond accordingly once received [1]. - Following the announcement of the dispute, Jiangsu Wuzhong's stock price fell by over 41% from 1.79 yuan per share to 1.04 yuan per share, while Aimeike's stock remained relatively stable [1]. Group 2: Historical Context - The exclusive distribution rights for AestheFill were granted to Jiangsu Wuzhong's subsidiary, Datou Medical, in August 2022, with the product approved for sale in mainland China in January 2024 [2]. - Aimeike's acquisition of control over Regen was completed on June 30, 2025, leading to the emergence of conflicts regarding the distribution agreement [2][3]. Group 3: Financial Implications - AestheFill has shown strong market performance, generating sales of 3.26 billion yuan in its first year and contributing significantly to Jiangsu Wuzhong's recovery, with a net profit of 70.48 million yuan in 2024, a 197.97% increase year-on-year [5][6]. - Jiangsu Wuzhong has invested over 400 million yuan in the clinical registration and market expansion of AestheFill, and the loss of distribution rights could severely impact its financial stability [6]. Group 4: Industry Insights - The dispute highlights the ongoing tension between brand owners and distributors in the medical aesthetics industry, where distributors often face uncertainties regarding their rights and the stability of their partnerships [7]. - The potential fallout from this dispute could lead to increased insecurity among distributors, which may negatively affect the marketing and sales performance of medical aesthetic products [7].