Core Viewpoint - Background checks have become a common practice in recruitment, but there are growing concerns about privacy invasion and inappropriate evaluations of candidates, leading to calls for stricter regulations and ethical standards in the process [1][2][3] Group 1: Background Check Practices - Background checks are increasingly extensive, covering not only professional history but also personal aspects such as marital status and social relationships, which raises ethical concerns [1][2] - The original intent of background checks should be to verify relevant professional information, such as work history and criminal records, rather than to conduct moral judgments on personal lives [1][2] Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Framework - The Personal Information Protection Law establishes the "minimum necessity principle," requiring companies to collect only information directly related to recruitment and to obtain explicit consent from candidates [2] - There is a need for legislative refinement to define the scope of permissible background checks and to prohibit the collection of sensitive data, with increased penalties for violations [2] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Multiple approaches are necessary to curb the misuse of background checks, including legislative measures, technological oversight, industry self-regulation, and empowering candidates to assert their rights [2][3] - Background check agencies should establish professional standards, such as requiring written evidence for negative information and implementing mechanisms for dispute review to maintain objectivity [2]
【世相百态】 企业对求职者背调须守法勿越界
Zheng Quan Shi Bao·2025-08-14 18:39