Group 1 - The "anti-involution" policy aims to address low-price disorderly competition rather than driving up prices, as the fundamental factor determining prices remains supply and demand, with current domestic effective demand still insufficient [1] - The "anti-involution" policy has been reinforced throughout the year, with various measures such as legal revisions and policy implementations to combat low-price competition, including the revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the draft Price Law [1][2] - The Producer Price Index (PPI) showed a year-on-year decline of -3.6% in July, but the month-on-month decline narrowed from -0.4% in June to -0.2%, indicating some stabilization in industrial prices due to policy effects [2] Group 2 - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) remains weak overall, but the core CPI has rebounded for three consecutive months, benefiting from reduced price wars in the automotive and home appliance sectors, as well as seasonal increases in service consumption [2] - The improvement in PPI is primarily seen in upstream raw materials and industrial products, which have a low direct correlation with consumer spending, indicating that the transmission mechanism from PPI to CPI remains ineffective [3] - The essence of the "anti-involution" policy is to correct rather than stimulate, focusing on market-oriented and legal methods to shift competition from price wars to quality, service, and innovation, promoting a healthier market structure [4]
中经评论:“反内卷”不会推动物价普遍上涨
Jing Ji Ri Bao·2025-08-15 00:02