【数说经济】“反内卷”不会推动物价普遍上涨

Group 1 - The essence of the "anti-involution" policy is "correction" rather than "stimulation," aiming to reshape the logic of industrial competition [2][6] - The impact of the "anti-involution" policy on prices is structural and mild, with future price trends dependent on the strength of demand recovery and the pace of policy coordination [2][6] - The "anti-involution" policy aims to address low-price disorderly competition in certain sectors rather than driving up prices, as the fundamental factor determining prices remains supply and demand [2][3] Group 2 - Since the beginning of the year, signals of the "anti-involution" policy have been continuously reinforced, with various measures taken to address "involution-style" competition [3] - The revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law prohibits selling goods below cost, providing a legal basis for combating "involution-style" competition [3] - Recent data shows that the Producer Price Index (PPI) has maintained a low level of -3.6% year-on-year in July, but the month-on-month decline has narrowed, indicating some stabilization in industrial prices [4] Group 3 - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) remains weak overall, but the core CPI has rebounded for three consecutive months, benefiting from reduced price wars in the automotive and home appliance sectors [4] - The improvement in PPI is primarily seen in upstream raw materials and industrial products, which have a low direct correlation with consumer spending [5] - The transmission mechanism from PPI to CPI remains ineffective, as insufficient terminal consumer demand limits companies' pricing power [5]