长江保护法实施四年，执法司法协同如何守护“一江碧水”｜记者观察

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and advancements in the ecological environment protection and judicial practices in the Yangtze River Basin, emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts among various departments to enhance ecological governance and support high-quality development [1][6]. Group 1: Legislative and Judicial Developments - The "Yangtze River Protection Law" has been in effect since March 1, 2021, leading to significant achievements in ecological protection through enhanced law enforcement, ecological restoration, and public participation [1]. - A total of 457,400 environmental resource cases have been adjudicated by courts across 19 provinces and municipalities in the Yangtze River Basin, showcasing the judicial system's role in environmental protection [1]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts and Case Studies - The Supreme People's Court's Environmental Resource Tribunal has highlighted successful case studies, such as the bankruptcy restructuring of a company in the Yangtze River Delta, which integrated environmental protection commitments into its recovery plan, attracting over 87 million yuan in investments [2]. - Courts in Hunan and Jiangsu have taken significant actions against environmentally harmful practices, such as declaring contracts for energy-intensive virtual currency mining equipment invalid, thereby promoting lower carbon production methods [2]. Group 3: Challenges in Environmental Judicial Practices - The article identifies key challenges in environmental judicial practices, including lengthy and costly environmental damage assessments, which hinder timely case resolutions [3]. - There is a lack of uniformity in judicial standards, as evidenced by discrepancies in sentencing for similar environmental offenses, indicating a need for standardized judicial practices [3]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The "Opinions" document proposes enhancing cross-regional coordination in environmental resource crime cases, emphasizing systematic governance and professional adjudication [6][7]. - It suggests improving the construction of ecological assessment and evaluation institutions, sharing expert resources, and promoting data collaboration among departments to address existing challenges in environmental governance [6][7].