高校告别“非升即走”不等于不要竞争

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles discusses the shift in several Chinese universities away from the "non-promotion means exit" policy, which has caused anxiety among many faculty members [1][2] - The "non-promotion means exit" system initially aimed to enhance performance and optimize faculty structure but has led to a narrow focus on quantity of research output, neglecting teaching quality and academic diversity [1][2] - The pressure on young faculty under this system has resulted in a detrimental academic environment, where the pursuit of quick results overshadows long-term scholarly development [1][2] Group 2 - Young faculty members are particularly affected by the "non-promotion means exit" policy, facing high expectations with limited resources, which can lead to significant career risks if they fail to meet performance standards [2][3] - The recent decision by multiple universities to abandon this policy is seen as a positive development, promoting a more supportive environment for academic exploration and reducing unnecessary stress [2][3] - The articles emphasize the need for a more scientific and humane evaluation system that balances quantitative and qualitative assessments, encouraging innovation while maintaining competitive standards [3]