地方审计暴露专项债新老问题，专家支招完善制度

Core Insights - The use of special bonds by local governments has shown significant effects on stabilizing investment and the economy, but issues in fund management and project oversight have been highlighted by recent audits [1][2][3] Group 1: Issues Identified - Recent audits from 17 provinces revealed problems in the management and use of special bond funds, including data inaccuracies in monitoring systems that hinder risk control [1][2] - Some local governments have exaggerated project benefits during the application process, leading to slow project progress or even project halts, resulting in idle funds [1][3] - There are instances of fund misappropriation, with some localities using special bond funds for unrelated expenditures, such as repaying loans or covering operational costs [4][5] Group 2: Financial Context - The scale of special bond issuance has been increasing, with an expected issuance of 4.4 trillion yuan this year, and the total local government special debt reaching approximately 34.8 trillion yuan by mid-year [2] - The reliance on special bonds as a financing tool has grown, especially during economic downturns, but the management capabilities of local governments have not kept pace with the rapid expansion of debt [2][8] Group 3: Underlying Causes - The lack of rigorous project evaluation and risk assessment has led to inflated project claims, with local governments often rushing to secure funding without thorough feasibility studies [8][9] - The mismatch between project financing and actual revenue generation has been a persistent issue, with many projects failing to meet expected returns [9][10] Group 4: Regulatory Responses - The State Council has initiated measures to address these issues, including the introduction of a "negative list" management model for special bond projects to enhance flexibility in fund allocation [12][13] - Recommendations for improving project evaluation processes include involving financial institutions in assessments and ensuring that revenue projections are realistic [13][14] Group 5: Future Directions - There is a call for deeper fiscal reforms to clarify the role of special bonds, ensuring they are used specifically for projects that can generate sufficient returns to cover debt obligations [15]