Group 1 - The use of AI to impersonate the voices of Olympic champions for commercial purposes raises legal concerns regarding the infringement of personal rights and potential misleading advertising [2][3][4] - The legal implications include both civil liabilities for violating personal rights and possible criminal liabilities for spreading false information [4] - The upcoming "Artificial Intelligence Generated Synthetic Content Identification Measures" aims to address these issues by requiring AI-generated content to be clearly marked, thus enhancing transparency and accountability [6] Group 2 - A landmark case in Beijing involved a user whose comment was misclassified as AI-generated content, leading to a court ruling that the platform failed to adequately explain its algorithmic decision-making process [8][9] - The court emphasized the platform's responsibility to provide sufficient evidence and explanations regarding its algorithm's operations, particularly in cases involving brief online content [9] - Trends in AI-related disputes show an increase in cases involving personality rights, copyright issues, and contractual disputes arising from AI technology usage [10]
AI乱象治理,要“打假”也要能“辨真”
Qi Lu Wan Bao·2025-08-19 06:38