IBM vs. ANET: Which Networking Stock Has More Growth Potential?

Core Insights - IBM and Arista Networks are key players in the enterprise and data-center networking sector, focusing on infrastructure essential for cloud computing and AI workloads [1][3] - IBM provides a range of solutions including hybrid cloud services, advanced IT solutions, and quantum computing, while Arista specializes in high-capacity Ethernet switches and routers [2][4] IBM Overview - IBM is expected to benefit from strong demand for hybrid cloud and AI, particularly in its Software and Consulting segments, with growth driven by analytics, cloud computing, and security [4] - The acquisition of HashiCorp enhances IBM's capabilities in managing complex cloud environments, complementing its Red Hat portfolio [5] - Despite growth potential, IBM faces intense competition from AWS and Azure, with pricing pressures impacting margins and profitability [6] Arista Overview - Arista leads in 100-gigabit Ethernet switches and is gaining traction in 200- and 400-gigabit products, supported by its unique EOS platform and CloudVision stack [7] - The company has introduced new software solutions that enhance its cloud-native offerings, setting it apart from competitors [9] - Arista's operating expenses increased by 13.8% to $452.4 million in Q2 2025, due to higher headcount and product introduction costs, which may affect margins [10] Financial Performance - Zacks estimates a 6.4% sales growth for IBM and 24.6% for Arista in 2025, with Arista also expected to show stronger EPS gains [8][11] - Over the past year, IBM's stock has increased by 23%, while Arista's has surged by 56.9% [13] - IBM's shares trade at a forward P/E ratio of 20.58, significantly lower than Arista's 45.38, indicating a more attractive valuation for IBM [16] Investment Considerations - Both companies are expected to see improvements in sales and profits in 2025, with long-term earnings growth expectations of 5.8% for IBM and 16.6% for Arista [18] - Arista shows better price performance and estimate revisions compared to IBM, making it a potentially better investment option at present [18]