儿童票，该凭年龄还是身高？

Core Points - The article discusses the confusion surrounding children's ticket pricing standards in theme parks and tourist attractions, highlighting two specific cases that sparked public interest [1][2] - There is a lack of uniformity in the criteria used to determine children's tickets, with different regions and industries adopting varying standards [5][12] Group 1: Ticket Pricing Standards - Many attractions use height as the primary criterion for children's tickets, with common thresholds such as free entry for children under 1.2 meters and half-price tickets for those between 1.2 and 1.4 meters [5] - Some theme parks, like Shanghai Disneyland and Beijing Happy Valley, offer a more flexible approach, allowing customers to choose between age and height for ticket eligibility [5][8] - Certain major attractions and museums, such as the National Museum of Natural History, primarily use age as the determining factor for children's tickets, specifying age ranges for eligibility [5] Group 2: Parental and Industry Perspectives - Many parents express frustration over the inconsistent standards for children's tickets, emphasizing that height should not be the sole criterion as it may disadvantage rapidly growing children [9] - From the perspective of attractions, height is preferred for its operational convenience, as measuring height is quick compared to verifying age, which may require identification [9] - Some attractions are concerned that adopting an age-based standard could lead to issues such as identity fraud, complicating management during peak seasons [9] Group 3: Regulatory Context - There is currently no mandatory national regulation governing children's ticket pricing in China, although a 2012 recommendation suggested a dual system based on both height and age [12] - Recent data indicates a significant increase in children's height in China, suggesting that the existing height-based standards may no longer serve the best interests of children [15] - Experts advocate for a shift towards age-based standards, arguing that the current reliance on height does not align with the principle of maximizing children's benefits [15]