Workflow
Should Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) Be on Your Investing Radar?
ZACKSยท2025-08-20 11:21

Core Insights - The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is a passively managed ETF launched on February 22, 2008, with assets exceeding $6.09 billion, targeting the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market [1] - Large cap companies typically have market capitalizations above $10 billion, characterized by stability and predictable cash flows, making them less volatile compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, and while they have outperformed growth stocks in most markets over the long term, they may underperform during strong bull markets [3] Costs - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.39%, which is competitive within its peer group, and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.38% [4] Sector Exposure and Top Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is to Healthcare, comprising approximately 17.9% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Staples [5] - Walmart Inc (WMT) represents about 3.79% of total assets, with Amazon.com Inc (AMZN) and Apple Inc (AAPL) also among the top holdings; the top 10 holdings account for around 23.31% of total assets [6] Performance and Risk - RWL aims to match the performance of the OFI Revenue Weighted Large Cap Index, which re-weights S&P 500 constituents based on revenue, with a maximum weighting of 5% per company [7] - The ETF has gained approximately 9.86% year-to-date and 13.41% over the past year, with a trading range of $89.02 to $106.82 in the last 52 weeks; it has a beta of 0.91 and a standard deviation of 14.36% over the trailing three years, indicating medium risk [8] Alternatives - The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), making it a strong option for investors interested in the Large Cap Value segment; alternatives include Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have larger asset bases and lower expense ratios [10][11] Bottom-Line - Passively managed ETFs like RWL are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12]