Workflow
韩国内批李在明访日与石破茂会谈时对历史问题避而不谈,李在明回应
Huan Qiu Wang·2025-08-25 02:36

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the tension between South Korea and Japan regarding historical issues, with South Korean President Lee Jae-myung emphasizing the need for cooperation despite these unresolved matters [1][3][4] - President Lee expressed that he anticipated criticism for not addressing historical and territorial disputes during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio, but he believes that economic, security, and cultural exchanges should not be hindered by these issues [3][4] - The joint statement from the South Korea-Japan summit did not address historical issues, leading to strong backlash from various South Korean civic groups, who accused the government of prioritizing "pragmatic diplomacy" over historical justice [4] Group 2 - The South Korean National Security Office head, Wei Shenglu, stated that while historical issues were mentioned, there was no detailed discussion, focusing instead on future cooperation and how to address related problems [3] - Reports indicate that the Japanese government intentionally avoided a Q&A session during the joint press conference to prevent questions regarding historical issues, reflecting a strategic approach to manage public perception [3] - Criticism from South Korean civic organizations suggests that the government may have made excessive concessions to Japan on significant historical perspectives, raising concerns about the implications of such diplomatic strategies [4]