二季度风格漂移基金盘点：涉及嘉实、华泰柏瑞、交银！多只规模不足1亿，个人投资者占比超99%

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "style drift" in public funds has raised concerns in the market, despite regulatory efforts to standardize and constrain it. Several funds have shown significant deviations from their stated investment themes in the second quarter of this year [1][11]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Characteristics - Several funds exhibiting style drift include: Baoying Modern Service Mixed, Beixin Ruifeng External Growth Theme Flexible Allocation, Huatai Bairui Health Life Mixed, and others, involving multiple institutions such as Jiashi and Huatai Bairui [1]. - The funds primarily affected are mixed funds, including equity-mixed and flexible allocation types, with some stock funds also showing drift. For instance, Baoying Modern Service Mixed is heavily concentrated in the pharmaceutical sector despite its name suggesting a focus on modern services [1]. - Performance analysis shows that some funds with style drift have high volatility and inconsistent returns. For example, Zhongyou Health Entertainment has a return of 62.22% this year, while Baoying Modern Service has increased by 64.73% [2]. Group 2: Structural Characteristics of Style Drift - The heavy holdings of these funds significantly deviate from their claimed thematic directions. For example, Baoying Modern Service's largest holding is a pharmaceutical company, which is not aligned with its stated theme [3]. - Other funds like Taixin Internet+ have major allocations in consumer and transportation stocks, diverging from their "Internet+" theme [4]. - Beixin Ruifeng External Growth is almost entirely invested in electric power stocks, which contradicts its stated investment logic [6]. Group 3: Fund Manager Experience and Investor Composition - The experience of fund managers and the scale of the products may influence the stability of investment styles. For instance, the largest fund, Jiaoyin Innovation Pioneer, has a total scale of 2.066 billion yuan [9]. - Most funds exhibiting style drift are primarily held by individual investors, with institutional investors showing a more cautious approach. For example, Huatai Bairui Health Life and Taixin Internet+ have 100% and over 99% of their holdings from individual investors, respectively [9]. Group 4: Regulatory and Industry Implications - The issue of style drift in public funds is not just a technical problem within rating systems but also relates to industry integrity and investor management. It highlights a disconnect between product design and actual investment practices [11]. - There is a call for enhanced supervision and disclosure regarding the consistency of fund investment styles to promote a return to transparent strategies and stable investment styles [11].