明确检验检测机构出具虚假报告情节严重的判定标准，市场监管总局征求意见

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has drafted an opinion to standardize the criteria for determining the severity of issuing false reports by inspection and testing institutions, aiming to enhance regulatory enforcement and ensure accountability in the industry [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Inspection and Testing - Inspection and testing are crucial components of the national quality infrastructure, playing a significant role in ensuring product quality, maintaining market order, and supporting high-quality economic and social development [1]. Group 2: Issues with Current Practices - There are instances where some institutions, driven by profit motives, falsify inspection data or issue false reports, severely damaging the integrity and credibility of the industry [1]. - The lack of unified standards and inconsistent enforcement in determining the severity of false report issuance affects the seriousness, effectiveness, and fairness of legal execution [1]. Group 3: Criteria for Severe Violations - The opinion outlines five scenarios that should be recognized as "severe": 1. Criminal offenses leading to legal accountability. 2. Administrative penalties for issuing false reports within the last two years, followed by another false report. 3. Issuing more than ten false reports, or two or more in critical areas affecting public health and safety [2]. 4. Causing major safety incidents, significant environmental impacts, or severe social consequences. 5. Other situations that should be legally recognized as severe [2]. Group 4: Enforcement Measures - Institutions meeting the severe criteria will face heavy penalties from market regulation authorities. In specific fields like food and medical device testing, any verified false report will lead to the revocation of testing qualifications, regardless of severity, and will be subject to increased fines [2]. - Institutions that issue false reports in areas defined by the Product Quality Law will also be recognized as severe and will face revocation of their testing qualifications and inclusion in a list of serious violators [2].