增强组合抗风险能力 “固收+”差异化策略拉开身位

Core Viewpoint - The performance of "fixed income +" products has significantly diverged in the second half of the year, with those leaning towards equities and convertible bonds showing notable gains, while those focused on pure bonds have lagged behind [1][3][4] Group 1: Performance of "Fixed Income +" Products - "Fixed income +" products with higher equity and convertible bond allocations have seen substantial performance increases, with some funds achieving returns over 20% since the second half of the year [2][4] - Specific funds such as Huashang Shuangyi A and Jinying Yuanfeng A reported returns of 24.71% and around 20% respectively, with high equity allocations exceeding 40% [2][4] - Conversely, funds primarily invested in pure bonds, like Fangzheng Fubang Hongyuan A, have underperformed, with long-duration bonds leading to negative returns since July [3][4] Group 2: Market Trends and Strategies - The current market environment, characterized by a strong equity market and weak bond market, has led to a higher acceptance of "fixed income +" products, particularly those with convertible bonds [4][5] - Fund managers are advised to dynamically adjust the allocation of the "+" component based on market trends and risk preferences, enhancing the risk-adjusted returns of the portfolio [6][7] - The focus on multi-asset strategies and the exploration of various "fixed income +" investment strategies have become prevalent in the public fund industry [7][8] Group 3: Asset Allocation Insights - Successful "fixed income +" funds have shown a tendency to overweight sectors such as metals, military, TMT, and healthcare, while underweighting cyclical and financial sectors [4][5] - The strategy of using convertible bonds has proven effective, with funds capturing significant gains from high-performing stocks [2][4] - The importance of dynamic asset valuation and the ability to hedge against market fluctuations are emphasized for optimizing returns in "fixed income +" portfolios [6][8]