Workflow
“花生上树”的良品铺子,如何让人相信“品控”

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding a misleading promotional poster by the company highlights significant lapses in its content review process, raising concerns about its operational integrity and consumer trust [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The promotional poster incorrectly depicted peanuts growing on branches, contradicting their biological characteristics, leading to public criticism [1]. - The company acknowledged the error, attributing it to a "work oversight" and stated that it would enhance its content review mechanisms [1]. Group 2: Company Response and Implications - The company's response was perceived as dismissive, failing to address the deeper issues of accountability and process integrity, which could lead to similar incidents in the future [2]. - The company's financial performance has deteriorated, with a reported 27.21% decline in overall revenue and a net loss of 93.55 million yuan in the first half of 2025, indicating potential operational challenges [2]. Group 3: Consumer Trust and Future Outlook - The lack of serious reflection on such a basic error raises doubts about the company's commitment to quality control and production standards, potentially exacerbating its already difficult business situation [2].