Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for local governments to avoid chaotic competition in the "Artificial Intelligence +" era, focusing on unique application scenarios and soft strengths rather than hard metrics like computing power and data storage [1][2] - The "Opinions" document suggests a forward-looking and systematic approach, urging local governments to implement AI strategies tailored to their specific conditions and industries [1][2] - The shift from a "one-size-fits-all" resource allocation to a "precise drip irrigation" model is necessary, with different sectors such as industry, agriculture, and services requiring targeted AI integration [2] Group 2 - The document highlights the importance of developing AI application service providers and creating an AI application service chain, which will alter the traditional resource monopoly held by leading regions [2] - Future intelligent applications or agents are expected to become new traffic entry points, allowing smaller cities and underdeveloped areas to bypass reliance on platform economies [2] - Specific examples of regional strategies include leveraging advanced manufacturing in the Yangtze River Delta for "AI + Industry" and utilizing biodiversity in the southwest for "AI + Ecological Protection" [1][2]
钟新龙:“人工智能+”行动推动地方政府“差异化破局”
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang·2025-08-29 16:23