美国上诉法院裁定特朗普关税非法 但暂时维持现状直至最高法院裁决

Core Points - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the broad tariffs implemented by the Trump administration lack legal basis but temporarily upheld the tariffs while the White House appeals to the Supreme Court [1] - The court's decision, made with a 7-4 vote, supports a previous ruling that the Trump administration overstepped presidential authority regarding tariffs [1] - The ruling could impact negotiations between the U.S. and certain trade partners if upheld by the Supreme Court, although it does not address tariffs on specific industries like steel and automobiles [1] Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Court previously ruled that Trump lacked the authority to impose global tariffs without explicit Congressional authorization under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [1] - The Appeals Court noted that it could not identify any clear Congressional authorization for the President to exercise tariff powers in such cases [1] - The Trump administration's rationale for imposing tariffs, citing reasons like "fentanyl cross-border input," was deemed insufficient by the court [1] Group 2 - Following the ruling, Trump criticized the court's decision on social media, claiming that if upheld, it would lead to the destruction of the U.S. [2] - Trump emphasized that tariffs are essential tools for supporting American workers and manufacturing [2] - Cabinet members warned that ruling against the President's authority to impose global tariffs could severely damage U.S. diplomatic and economic security [2]