【环球财经】特朗普政府滥施关税司法争议加大

Group 1 - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that President Trump's authority to impose tariffs on multiple countries was not granted by the law he cited, leading to significant uncertainty in international trade until the Supreme Court makes a final decision [1][3] - The ruling maintained that the comprehensive tariff policy implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act exceeded presidential authority, as it only allows targeted economic measures in response to "unusual and extraordinary threats" [1][2] - The current tariffs will remain in effect until October 14, allowing the Trump administration to appeal to the Supreme Court, which could have a substantial impact on U.S. trade policy and the global economy [3] Group 2 - The tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles, implemented under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, are not affected by this ruling [2] - Trump's administration and key officials argue that removing tariffs would lead to a collapse of trade agreements and harm ongoing negotiations, emphasizing the importance of tariffs for supporting American workers and manufacturing [2][3] - The ruling has been viewed as a setback for Trump, contributing to market instability and raising concerns about price increases and economic slowdown [3]