女子开会时间过长没挪车，新能源车充电超时94分钟被收438.4元，怒告车企要求退费，法院：一分不用退

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the issue of excessive overtime fees charged to electric vehicle owners for occupying charging spaces beyond the allotted time, raising questions about the fairness and transparency of such charges in the industry [1][5]. Charging Fee Structure - A Shanghai electric vehicle owner incurred a total charge of 546.85 yuan, of which 438.4 yuan was for overtime fees due to occupying the charging space for 94 minutes after charging was completed [1][3]. - Different charging brands have varying overtime fee structures, with Tesla charging 3.2 yuan per minute when less than 50% of spaces are available, and 6.4 yuan when no spaces are available [6]. - Other brands like Li Auto and Zeekr have their own fee structures, with Li Auto charging 2 yuan per minute after 15 minutes of completion, and Zeekr charging 1 yuan per minute after 30 minutes, capped at 50 yuan [6]. Legal and Consumer Rights - The Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court upheld the legality of overtime fees, stating they serve as a penalty for breach of contract and are intended to encourage timely vehicle removal from charging stations [5]. - The court noted that the charging company had adequately informed the consumer about the overtime fees through various communication channels, including their website and mobile app [5]. - Consumer rights advocates emphasize the necessity for clear communication of fee structures to protect consumer rights, suggesting that excessively high fees could be subject to legal review [6].