25款登山鞋测评：凯乐石、斯凯奇、FILA等样品不防水

Core Insights - The recent comparative test of 25 hiking shoes conducted by the Guangdong-Macao-Guangzhou Consumer Council revealed that while the overall quality of the shoes is good, several products exhibited issues such as inaccurate application of standards and poor performance on key indicators [1][7][17] - Specific brands such as KAILAS, Skechers, and FILA were noted for having products that easily allowed water penetration, failing to meet waterproof standards [1][16] - The test highlighted that 20 samples lacked critical technical indicators like slip resistance and waterproof performance, with 13 samples showing inadequate waterproof capabilities [7][12] Summary by Categories Testing Standards and Methodology - The testing was based on various national standards including GB 25038-2024 and QB/T 4553-2013, focusing on both chemical safety and physical performance indicators [2] - Key performance indicators tested included formaldehyde content, abrasion resistance, slip resistance, waterproof performance, and vapor permeability [2] Product Performance Issues - Five samples were found to be highly permeable to water, indicating poor waterproof capabilities, while one sample from the brand "特步" failed to meet abrasion resistance standards [1][8] - The comparative test results showed that 7 samples had a peel strength below 70N, which is below the standard requirement of 90N/cm, affecting the durability of the shoes [10][11] - Ten samples exhibited poor vapor permeability, with some brands like 回力 and 探路者 scoring below the acceptable threshold [12][15] Recommendations for Manufacturers - The Consumer Council suggested that manufacturers should adhere to appropriate standards based on the characteristics and intended use of hiking shoes to ensure quality [17] - It was recommended that marketing claims should accurately reflect the product's actual quality to avoid misleading consumers [17] - Detailed labeling of key product information was advised to assist consumers in making informed purchasing decisions [17]