Workflow
一年中最动荡月份来了!美股今年能否打破魔咒
Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-09-01 23:49

Core Viewpoint - September historically shows a decline in the S&P 500 index, averaging nearly 2% over the past decade, with current uncertainties such as potential Fed rate cuts and political pressures adding to market volatility [1][3]. Market Performance - September is noted as the most volatile month for U.S. markets, with a 56% probability of decline in the S&P 500 index since 1927, averaging a drop of 1.17%. In the last decade, the average decline has worsened to 1.93% [3]. - In the first year of a presidential term, the S&P 500 index has a 58% chance of declining in September, with an average drop of 1.62% [3]. Valuation and Investment Trends - The forward P/E ratio of the S&P 500 index has reached 22 times, nearing levels seen at the end of the internet bubble, raising concerns about potential sell-off pressures during portfolio rebalancing at the end of September [4]. - Recent market shifts show cyclical sectors and small-cap stocks leading gains, while large tech stocks lagged behind. Non-essential consumer goods ETFs rose by 4.3%, financial sector ETFs by 2.6%, and the Russell 2000 small-cap index increased by 7.3% [4]. Economic Indicators - Recent U.S. economic data presents a mixed picture, with significant drops in non-farm payrolls from May to July, while retail sales and major retailers' earnings indicate strong consumer spending [4]. - The upcoming non-farm payroll report is expected to show an increase of 75,000 jobs, with the unemployment rate potentially rising to 4.3% [7]. Federal Reserve Outlook - The Fed is anticipated to consider rate cuts due to recent employment data, with Chairman Powell indicating a shift in stance towards a more accommodative policy [7][9]. - Market expectations for rate cuts have fluctuated, with the probability of more than two cuts this year dropping from over 50% to below 30% [9]. Political Pressures - Concerns arise regarding the Fed's independence amid political pressures from the Trump administration, particularly regarding the potential influence over the Fed's board composition [9].