Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-09-02 21:12Core Points - A recent antitrust ruling by a U.S. court determined that Google is not required to sell its Chrome browser or divest its Android operating system, leading to a 6.7% increase in Google's stock price in after-hours trading [1] - The ruling is part of a broader initiative by the U.S. government to regulate large tech companies, including Meta Platforms, Amazon, and Apple, to control their market dominance [1] - Google is also facing another lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding its alleged illegal monopoly in the online advertising technology sector, which may further impact its business model [2] Group 1 - The court's decision directly addressed the prosecutors' demands to reduce Google's market influence by selling Chrome and Android, which are key products in the smartphone operating system market [1] - The ruling requires Google to share information with competitors to address its monopoly behavior in the online search space [1] - Analysts suggest that despite the legal challenges, Google's retention of its main product lines may help maintain its competitive edge in the short term [2] Group 2 - The European Union is also monitoring Google's market behavior but has paused part of its penalty plans related to Google's abuse of its advertising technology dominance, potentially influenced by geopolitical factors [2] - The expected internal deadline for EU fines against Google has been postponed, which may involve further constraints on Google's business model [2] - The evolving legal landscape indicates that Google's market practices will face increased scrutiny, necessitating strategic adjustments in response to changing market conditions and regulatory requirements [2]