Xin Hua She·2025-09-03 09:47Core Points - A U.S. federal district court judge ruled that Google does not need to divest its Chrome browser and Android operating system but must share more data with competitors and establish an antitrust technology committee to oversee its operations [2][3] - The ruling is seen as a rare victory for Google against federal antitrust enforcers, allowing the company to make only "modest modifications" to its operations while continuing its business [2] - The judge's decision was influenced by the intense competition brought about by advancements in artificial intelligence, which is reshaping the technology industry [2] Summary by Sections Antitrust Ruling - The court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Chrome is a substantial part of Google's monopoly in the search market, thus not requiring divestiture [2] - Google is required to share some search data with competitors, which may help companies like Microsoft improve their search products, but key databases will not be included in the data sharing [2][3] Impact on Industry - The ruling is favorable for device manufacturers like Apple, as Google can continue to pay billions annually to have its search engine set as the default on smart devices [3] - Chrome is the most widely used browser globally, holding nearly two-thirds of the U.S. browser market share [3] Future Considerations - Following the ruling, the U.S. Department of Justice is considering its next steps, while Google has expressed concerns about data sharing affecting user privacy and is evaluating the ruling closely [3] - The antitrust lawsuit against Google has been ongoing for about five years, initiated during the Trump administration and continuing under the Biden administration [3]