ZACKSยท2025-09-03 16:36Core Viewpoint - A U.S. Judge has dismissed an antitrust lawsuit against 10 major banks, indicating a lack of evidence for collusion or market manipulation in corporate bond pricing [1][6]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Overview - The lawsuit involved allegations against Bank of America, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, and Barclays, among others, claiming they manipulated corporate bond prices to the detriment of retail investors [1][2]. - Investors accused these banks of imposing excessive charges on "odd-lot" trades, which are trades valued under $1 million or involving fewer than 1,000 bonds, leading to profits that were significantly inflated by 25% to 300% compared to larger "round-lot" trades [2]. Legal Proceedings - The case was initially dismissed in October 2021 by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman, who later disclosed a potential conflict of interest due to his wife's holdings in Bank of America [3]. - In July 2024, the federal government appealed the dismissal, citing concerns over Liman's impartiality [3]. Court's Findings - U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni stated that investors did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that the banks conspired to manipulate pricing through their trading platforms or to exclude alternative platforms [4]. - Despite the banks controlling approximately 65% of underwriting and 90% of trading in corporate bonds, this did not equate to control over secondary market pricing [5]. - The court found no evidence of illegal activity in the four years leading up to the lawsuit's filing, which weakened the case under the Sherman Antitrust Act [5]. - The dismissal was issued with prejudice, meaning the lawsuit cannot be refiled [5].