【环球财经】美法官裁定特朗普政府冻结哈佛大学经费违宪

Core Viewpoint - A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's freezing of $2.2 billion in federal research funding to Harvard University, under the pretext of combating anti-Semitism, was unconstitutional and ordered the government to unfreeze the funds [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Ruling - The ruling was made by Judge Allison Burroughs of the Massachusetts Federal District Court, who stated that the federal government's actions were ideologically driven attacks on a top American university [1]. - The judge found that the Trump administration's actions violated the Administrative Procedure Act and infringed upon Harvard's First Amendment rights [1]. - Burroughs characterized the funding freeze as "arbitrary and capricious" and agreed to permanently prohibit the federal government from issuing new funding freeze orders [1]. Group 2: Background and Context - The Trump administration had previously demanded significant reforms in Harvard's management structure, hiring, and admissions policies, which the university rejected [2]. - Following Harvard's refusal, the Trump administration announced the freeze on $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and $60 million in multi-year contract funds [2]. - Harvard filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that the funding freeze was an attempt to control the university's academic decisions [2]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The Trump administration also implemented measures to limit Harvard's enrollment of foreign students, with ongoing legal disputes related to these actions [3]. - Since January, the administration has pressured several prominent universities to adjust their policies to eliminate anti-Semitism and end preferential admissions for minority groups, threatening funding cuts if they do not comply [3]. - In July, other universities such as the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and Brown University reached agreements with the federal government regarding these issues [3].