Workflow
积极探索开展海洋碳汇核算
Jing Ji Ri Bao·2025-09-04 22:04

Core Viewpoint - The marine carbon sink, also known as "blue carbon," has a significantly higher carbon sequestration capacity than terrestrial ecosystems, and its accounting is essential for supporting carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals while promoting high-quality marine economic development [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Marine Carbon Sink Accounting - Marine carbon sink accounting aims to provide quantitative support for carbon asset management, carbon trading system construction, and ecological compensation mechanisms under carbon peak and carbon neutrality targets [1]. - It assists in achieving "dual carbon" goals by accurately assessing China's contributions to climate change mitigation and providing data support for carbon peak and carbon neutrality objectives [2]. - The accounting promotes the development of a blue carbon trading market, realizing the value of marine carbon sinks and creating a positive cycle of "ecological protection and restoration - carbon sink value realization - ecological protection feedback" [1][2]. Group 2: Progress in Marine Carbon Sink Accounting - China has made significant progress in marine carbon sink accounting, including the gradual improvement of the policy system and the establishment of standards such as the "Marine Carbon Sink Accounting Method" [2]. - Local governments have developed regional guidelines and technical regulations for marine carbon sink accounting, with notable initiatives in Guangdong and Guangxi [2]. - Innovative practices have emerged, such as the development of marine carbon sink finance in Shandong and carbon sink loans in Long Island, enhancing the realization of blue carbon value [2]. Group 3: Challenges in Marine Carbon Sink Accounting - Existing challenges include an incomplete accounting system, weak technical foundations, and an underdeveloped market mechanism, leading to potential underestimation of carbon sink capacity [3]. - There is a lack of unified standards for carbon input from coastal wetlands and land-sea carbon flux, which may result in double counting [3]. - The market demand for marine carbon sinks is significantly lower than that for forest carbon sinks, hindering effective large-scale trading [3]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - It is recommended to establish binding national accounting standards to ensure consistency and scientific accuracy in marine carbon sink accounting [4]. - Strengthening technological support through an integrated ecological environment monitoring network is essential for accurately perceiving dynamic changes in carbon sinks [4]. - Promoting market and financial innovations, such as integrating marine carbon sinks into the national carbon trading market and providing policy incentives for blue carbon projects, is crucial for enhancing participation and funding [4].