美国首都起诉特朗普政府“非法部署”国民警卫队

Core Viewpoint - The Attorney General of Washington D.C., Karl Racine, has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration regarding the deployment of the National Guard in the capital, asserting that it undermines local autonomy and public safety [1] Group 1: Legal and Political Context - The lawsuit aims to defend local autonomy in Washington D.C. and to stop what is described as the "illegal deployment" of the National Guard [1] - The deployment of the National Guard is viewed as a violation of local governance and basic freedoms, with Racine stating that no city should be "involuntarily militarily occupied" [1] - The D.C. Home Rule Act grants Washington D.C. local autonomy, allowing residents to elect their own mayor and city council, although Congress retains ultimate authority over laws and budgets [1] Group 2: National Guard Deployment - Over 2,000 National Guard members are currently deployed in Washington D.C. to assist in restoring law and order [1] - The deployment was announced by Trump on August 11, who referred to several Democratic-led cities as "problem cities" [1] Group 3: Judicial Precedent - A recent ruling by Judge Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California found that the Trump administration's deployment of troops to Los Angeles in June to address public protests violated the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits military involvement in domestic law enforcement without Congressional approval [1]