美政府败诉，冻结哈佛资金被判违宪

Core Points - A federal judge ruled in favor of Harvard University, stating that the U.S. government's freezing of federal research funds, exceeding $2 billion, was unconstitutional [1] - The judge emphasized the need to combat anti-Semitism while also protecting academic freedom and free speech rights under the First Amendment [1] - Harvard's president acknowledged ongoing challenges despite the ruling and expressed concerns about potential government appeals [1] Group 1 - The court's decision indicates a temporary victory for Harvard University in its legal battle against the U.S. government [1] - The judge criticized the government's actions as ideologically driven attacks on a leading academic institution [1] - The White House spokesperson announced plans to appeal the ruling, asserting that Harvard has failed to protect its students from harassment [1] Group 2 - Since January, the Trump administration has pressured several prominent universities to address anti-Semitism and revise admissions policies favoring minority groups [2] - Other universities, including the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and Brown University, have reached agreements with the federal government [2] - Discussions are ongoing between the Trump administration and Harvard's leadership regarding a potential agreement to resolve the investigation and restore federal funding [2]