Jin Rong Shi Bao·2025-09-05 03:07Core Viewpoint - Regulatory authorities maintain a strict enforcement attitude towards the misuse of funds by major shareholders and related parties of listed companies, with recent penalties imposed on two companies for fund occupation issues [1][8]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Shandong Xinhua Jin International Co., Ltd. (Xinhua Jin) received an administrative penalty from the Qingdao Securities Regulatory Bureau for non-operational occupation of company funds amounting to 406 million yuan [2]. - *ST Lingda was warned and fined 1 million yuan by the Dalian Securities Regulatory Bureau for failing to disclose related party fund occupation and guarantee matters [3]. Group 2: Company Responses - Tibet Development Co., Ltd. (ST Xifa) announced a plan to resolve fund occupation issues by having its controlling shareholder, Xizang Shengbang Holdings Co., Ltd., offset 150 million yuan of occupied funds with a debt [4]. - ST Xifa's resolution of 331 million yuan in fund occupation issues is expected to enhance its financial condition and promote long-term stable development [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Context - Fund occupation is defined as the act of major shareholders misappropriating company funds, which can lead to significant risks for listed companies, including potential delisting [7]. - The regulatory environment has intensified, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission cracking down on 35 fund occupation cases in 2024, highlighting the ongoing issues within the industry [8].