美突击搜查韩企，韩国震惊：“这难道不是在大举投资后，反而遭到背弃吗？”

Core Points - The U.S. conducted a large-scale enforcement action at a joint battery plant of Hyundai Motor and LG Energy Solution in Georgia, detaining 475 individuals, primarily South Korean nationals, raising concerns about U.S.-South Korea relations during sensitive trade negotiations [1][4][8] - The enforcement involved multiple U.S. agencies and was characterized as the largest single-location operation by the Department of Homeland Security, leading to significant apprehensions regarding the business environment for South Korean companies in the U.S. [2][4] - The incident has prompted the South Korean government to express regret and concern over the treatment of its citizens and the potential implications for future investments in the U.S. [2][5][8] Group 1: Enforcement Action Details - The operation involved various U.S. law enforcement agencies, including the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Drug Enforcement Administration, utilizing helicopters and military vehicles [2] - Among those detained, 47 were employees of LG Energy Solution, with the majority being South Korean nationals, leading to immediate corporate responses such as halting non-essential travel to the U.S. [2][3] - The enforcement action has been described as a collision of U.S. policies on illegal immigration and the push for American manufacturing, creating a complex environment for foreign companies [4][7] Group 2: Implications for South Korean Companies - The enforcement action has raised alarms among South Korean businesses regarding the stability of the U.S. investment climate, with fears that similar actions could occur in other sectors such as semiconductors and automotive [4][8] - The incident has been perceived as a pressure tactic on South Korean firms to hire more American workers, despite the challenges in finding qualified personnel [4][7] - The South Korean government is reportedly negotiating the release of detained individuals, indicating a potential easing of tensions, but concerns about future U.S. policies remain high [8]