Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the controversy surrounding Lai Ching-te's remarks on the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War, which are seen as an attempt to distort history and provoke division between Taiwan and mainland China [1][3][12] - Experts emphasize that the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's return to China should be commemorated as a shared honor for both sides, rather than inciting hatred [1][3][7] - Lai's use of the term "end of war" instead of "victory in the Anti-Japanese War" is criticized for downplaying the aggressor's responsibility and attempting to sever ties between the two sides [5][9][11] Group 2 - The articles highlight the historical context of Taiwan's struggle against Japanese colonial rule, noting that many Taiwanese sacrificed their lives for the cause, and that the victory in the Anti-Japanese War was crucial for Taiwan's liberation [11][12][14] - Lai Ching-te's comments are viewed as aligning with Japanese right-wing ideologies, which is seen as a betrayal of historical facts and a disservice to the sacrifices made by ancestors [7][9][14] - The current political climate is described as one where Taiwan's leadership is increasingly reliant on external powers, particularly Japan, due to changing perceptions from the United States [9][18]
抗战历史不容歪曲 胜利荣耀同属两岸
Yang Shi Xin Wen Ke Hu Duan·2025-09-08 03:00