Nanjing CIGU Technology (SH:688448) Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-09-10 03:14Company Overview - Magv Technology Co., Ltd. is located in Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, and was established on September 22, 2006. The company went public on September 21, 2022. Its main business involves the research, production, and sales of magnetic suspension fluid machinery, magnetic suspension bearings, high-speed motors, and high-speed drives [1] - The revenue composition of the company includes: 84.85% from magnetic suspension air products, 10.75% from other products, 4.32% from magnetic suspension special media products, and 0.09% from contract energy management [1] Stock Performance - On September 10, Magv Technology's stock rose by 5.08%, reaching a price of 45.75 yuan per share, with a trading volume of 79.0974 million yuan and a turnover rate of 3.69%. The total market capitalization is 3.278 billion yuan [1] Shareholder Information - Noan Fund has a presence among the top ten circulating shareholders of Magv Technology, with its Noan Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund (320016) newly entering the top ten in the second quarter, holding 346,700 shares, which accounts for 0.72% of the circulating shares. The estimated floating profit today is approximately 766,100 yuan [2] - The Noan Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund was established on August 9, 2011, with a latest scale of 1.399 billion yuan. Year-to-date returns are 60.16%, ranking 321 out of 8,177 in its category; one-year returns are 120.31%, ranking 167 out of 7,982; and since inception, the return is 209.1% [2] Fund Manager Information - The fund managers of Noan Multi-Strategy Mixed A are Kong Xianzheng and Wang Haichang. As of the report, Kong Xianzheng has a tenure of 4 years and 289 days, with a total fund asset size of 4.607 billion yuan, achieving a best fund return of 72.32% and a worst return of -16.74% during his tenure [3] - Wang Haichang has a tenure of 3 years and 51 days, managing a total fund asset size of 2.529 billion yuan, with a best fund return of 60.19% and a worst return of -18.8% during his tenure [3]