行政机关设定共享电单车特许经营权，最高法判了

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China recognized a case of administrative power abuse in the shared electric bike sector, ruling against the establishment of exclusive operating rights that limit competition [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - A company in Hangzhou, which provides internet bike rental services, filed a lawsuit against local administrative bodies for unlawfully establishing and implementing exclusive operating rights for shared electric bikes [1]. - The first-instance court dismissed the company's lawsuit, leading to an appeal to the Supreme People's Court [1]. Group 2: Court Ruling - The Supreme People's Court found that the actions of the local administrative bodies in granting exclusive operating rights to a specific company were illegal and constituted an abuse of administrative power that restricted competition [2]. - The court ruled to revoke the first-instance judgment and annul the administrative decision to grant exclusive rights, emphasizing the lack of legal basis and the overreach of authority by the administrative bodies [2]. Group 3: Implications - The ruling is significant for clarifying the standards for identifying abuse of administrative power that restricts competition, promoting market access, and enhancing market vitality in the context of building a unified national market [2].