Workflow
伪造“橡胶指纹”帮同事代打卡,被公司发现后双双辞退!2人均起诉索赔,法院判了
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen·2025-09-10 07:58

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving an employee using a rubber fingerprint to clock in for a colleague has led to both individuals being dismissed from their jobs, highlighting the serious consequences of violating company attendance policies [1][12]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Zhang, an employee at a clothing company, was found to have used a rubber fingerprint to have a colleague clock in for him on multiple occasions [1][8]. - The company discovered this practice after receiving a tip-off and subsequently reviewed surveillance footage, confirming the misconduct [8][12]. - Zhang's actions were deemed a violation of the company's attendance policy as outlined in the employee handbook, which was agreed upon by employees during a representative meeting [4][12]. Group 2: Company Policies - The employee handbook, effective from January 1, 2018, includes strict rules regarding attendance, stating that employees must clock in at designated locations and that unauthorized absences or clocking in for others will be treated as absenteeism [4][12]. - The handbook also specifies that violations of attendance policies can lead to immediate termination of employment [4][12]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - Following the dismissal, Zhang contested the company's decision, claiming that the handbook was not properly established and that he had received verbal permission for his absences [10][12]. - The court ruled in favor of the company, stating that Zhang's actions constituted a serious breach of the established policies, which were legally binding [12][16]. - The court also noted that the company had rectified any procedural issues regarding the notification of the labor union, thus validating the termination process [16][17].