“男子地铁被误会偷拍案”二审维持原判：两女子不构成“诬陷”，曾先后3次道歉，驳回男子上诉请求

Core Viewpoint - The Chengdu Railway Transport Intermediate Court upheld the original ruling in the case of a personality rights dispute between appellant He and respondents Luo and Zeng, as well as the Chengdu Metro Operations Company, dismissing the appeal [1] Group 1: Court Proceedings - The second-instance hearing took place on September 8, 2025, where new evidence was presented by both parties regarding the incident that occurred on June 11, 2023, involving a dispute over the reflective surface of He’s shoes [2][3] - The court found that the facts established in the second instance were largely consistent with those in the first instance, confirming that the dispute arose from Luo and Zeng questioning whether He’s shoes contained a camera [2][3] Group 2: Apologies and Reactions - Luo and Zeng issued three apologies to He, including an in-person apology during the incident, a public apology published in the media, and a courtroom apology during the second-instance hearing [5][6] - Despite the apologies, He did not accept them, citing a lack of sincerity in the initial apologies [5] Group 3: Legal Findings - The court determined that Luo and Zeng's actions did not constitute defamation or malicious intent, as their questioning was based on observable phenomena and did not involve derogatory language [8][9] - The court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Luo and Zeng's actions resulted in a reduction of He’s social standing, thus ruling that there was no infringement of He’s personality rights [10]