崇川法院：多维发力破解执行裁判难题 “执”写司法为民答卷

Core Viewpoint - The execution process in judicial cases is crucial for achieving fairness and justice, and the execution tribunal plays a key role in resolving disputes and protecting the legal rights of the public [1] Group 1: Execution Case Statistics - From 2022 to the first half of 2025, the Chongchuan Court accepted a total of 817 execution objection cases and 210 execution objection lawsuits, with 822 execution objection cases and 182 execution objection lawsuits concluded [3] - The annual case acceptance numbers show an overall declining trend, indicating the effectiveness of the court's governance work [3] Group 2: Case Structure and Challenges - Disputes in cases are primarily concentrated on issues such as "discrepancy between name and reality" of property rights and conflicts of multiple rights, with the highest proportion of cases involving third parties claiming ownership to exclude execution [3] - New types of objections, such as residential rights and leasing rights, are gradually emerging [3] Group 3: Innovative Mechanisms - To address challenges in execution adjudication, the Chongchuan Court has implemented innovative mechanisms, including the responsibility system and case review mechanism, enhancing business learning to improve the quality and efficiency of execution adjudication [3] - The court has established a pre-examination mechanism for execution disputes to promote substantive resolution of objections and prevent abuse of objections through a warning mechanism [3] Group 4: Judicial Principles and Case Examples - The execution adjudication work emphasizes the principle of good faith and civilized execution, prioritizing the review of cases involving survival rights and promptly lifting improper execution measures [4] - A typical case involved the court supporting the rental rights of two employees living in a property seized during execution, highlighting the need to respect historical welfare housing rights [4] Group 5: Future Directions - The Chongchuan Court plans to continue deepening reforms in execution adjudication mechanisms to address execution difficulties and contribute to the protection of legal rights and the optimization of the legal business environment [4]